User:Romancewiki - Revision history

Frankieroyle: asking for help

2012-07-18T11:56:22Z

asking for help

Kay T at 23:14, 19 September 2010

2010-09-19T23:14:22Z

Cattitude at 06:51, 11 January 2009

2009-01-11T06:51:42Z

Kay T: done

2008-12-23T20:09:34Z

done

Uvolbert at 12:41, 20 December 2008

2008-12-20T12:41:49Z

Uvolbert at 13:18, 30 July 2008

2008-07-30T13:18:19Z

Uvolbert at 13:14, 30 July 2008

2008-07-30T13:14:14Z

Uvolbert at 13:13, 30 July 2008

2008-07-30T13:13:22Z

Dlau at 00:38, 1 May 2008

2008-05-01T00:38:11Z

Dlau at 14:05, 11 April 2008

2008-04-11T14:05:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:56, 18 July 2012
Line 60:		Line 60:

	--[[User:Kay T\|Kay T]] 23:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Kay T\|Kay T]] 23:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	Hello ... um help I am not sure I know what I am doing here or how to do it, I hope this will work. I realy need someone to talk me through this so I can get the hang of it, I have been trying to figure it out for ages--[[User:Frankieroyle\|Frankieroyle]] 04:56, 18 July 2012 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 19 September 2010
Line 51:		Line 51:

	I just figured out some of the navigation. I listed a few of the books I have in a previous post but if you would like me to send you a complete list of the ones that I have please let me know. There are quite a few so far. --[[User:Teresa58\|Teresa58]] 10:54, 12 March 2008 (PDT)		I just figured out some of the navigation. I listed a few of the books I have in a previous post but if you would like me to send you a complete list of the ones that I have please let me know. There are quite a few so far. --[[User:Teresa58\|Teresa58]] 10:54, 12 March 2008 (PDT)
		+
		+
		+	==Oops==
		+
		+	I guess we have not been paying attention much. See this wonder addition to the wiki.
		+
		+	http://www.romancewiki.com/Quick_Runescape_Experience
		+
		+	--[[User:Kay T\|Kay T]] 23:14, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:51, 11 January 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.		To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.
		+
		+	Dear RomanceWiki,
		+
		+	I see that there is a page devoted to Love Inspired Historical, however, there is no link available on the "Category: Numbered Series" page. I would like to ask that a link to the Love Inspired Historical by the Numbers page be included on the appropriate Category: Numbered Series page please. Thank you!

	Hi RomanceWiki,		Hi RomanceWiki,

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 23 December 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:

	would you please unlock the ''Harlequin Romance By The Numbers'' page? The years 2008 and 2009 have already been added to the site, but you can't access them via the "Harlequin Romance By The Numbers" page. -- --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 04:41, 20 December 2008 (PST)		would you please unlock the ''Harlequin Romance By The Numbers'' page? The years 2008 and 2009 have already been added to the site, but you can't access them via the "Harlequin Romance By The Numbers" page. -- --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 04:41, 20 December 2008 (PST)
		+
		+	Done. --[[User:Kay T\|Kay T]] 12:09, 23 December 2008 (PST)

	Hi RomanceWiki,		Hi RomanceWiki,

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 20 December 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.		To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.
		+
		+	Hi RomanceWiki,
		+
		+	would you please unlock the ''Harlequin Romance By The Numbers'' page? The years 2008 and 2009 have already been added to the site, but you can't access them via the "Harlequin Romance By The Numbers" page. -- --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 04:41, 20 December 2008 (PST)

	Hi RomanceWiki,		Hi RomanceWiki,

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 30 July 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Hi RomanceWiki,		Hi RomanceWiki,

−	I have a bit of a problem with the [[:~~Catgory:Category:XXXX Releases\|~~Category:XXXX Releases]]. I - and others - use it to categorize an unknown release date, and I must confess I didn't look fist because it seems so logical! Maybe the fiction genre can be moved to another category? --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 06:13, 30 July 2008 (PDT)	+	I have a bit of a problem with the [[:Category:XXXX Releases]]. I - and others - use it to categorize an unknown release date, and I must confess I didn't look fist because it seems so logical! Maybe the fiction genre can be moved to another category? --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 06:13, 30 July 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:14, 30 July 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Hi RomanceWiki,		Hi RomanceWiki,

−	I have a bit of a problem with the [[:Catgory:Category:XXXX Releases]]. I - and others - use it to categorize an unknown release date, and I must confess I didn't look fist because it seems so logical! Maybe the fiction genre can be moved to another category? --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 06:13, 30 July 2008 (PDT)	+	I have a bit of a problem with the [[:Catgory:Category:XXXX Releases\|Category:XXXX Releases]]. I - and others - use it to categorize an unknown release date, and I must confess I didn't look fist because it seems so logical! Maybe the fiction genre can be moved to another category? --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 06:13, 30 July 2008 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 30 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.		To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.
		+
		+	Hi RomanceWiki,
		+
		+	I have a bit of a problem with the [[:Catgory:Category:XXXX Releases]]. I - and others - use it to categorize an unknown release date, and I must confess I didn't look fist because it seems so logical! Maybe the fiction genre can be moved to another category? --[[User:Uvolbert\|ursel]] 06:13, 30 July 2008 (PDT)
		+

	Hi again RomanceWiki,		Hi again RomanceWiki,

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 1 May 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.		To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.
		+
		+	Hi again RomanceWiki,
		+
		+	Just wanted to let you know that I did this month's edition of my monthly column for eCataromance ("The Life of e") about RW. Please visit this page: http://www.ecataromance.com/index.php?cat=56 and you will see the link for the article. I hope it helps spread the word about this great site!
		+
		+	Diana Laurence --[[User:Dlau\|Dlau]] 17:38, 30 April 2008 (PDT)

	Hello RomanceWiki!		Hello RomanceWiki!

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 11 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.		To talk to the editors, start typing below. Use the signature button (second from right above) to add your username, if you wish.
		+
		+	Hello RomanceWiki!
		+
		+	[I have no idea if this is how I should respond to your communication, so I hope you read this. I tried several ways, but I'm thinking this is probably the best one.]
		+
		+	First of all, thanks for your warm welcome!
		+
		+	I apologize for not following protocol and thank you for pointing it out in such a warm way. I have put in all the links for the reviews of my books this morning. The reason I didn't originally, was because some of them are older and the links are no longer live; however, I have put in all the links as they originally were, and hopefully most are still good.
		+
		+	The reason I quote the review extensively is also because review sites do not retain their posts forever and I hate to lose the review content. I agree with you that some of these review excerpts are on the lengthy side, but they are all taken from my website, and when I post them I always let the review site know I have done so. I've never been asked by any site to remove or reduce them, so I think they are acceptible.
		+
		+	That said, you are correct though that I'm sure all these review sites would appreciate the links, and it has always been my policy to include them on my website. I just got lazy! There you have it! :-) But you are right, I should have taken the time. All is corrected now and I hope will be acceptible also to RomanceWiki. Please let me know if not.
		+
		+	This site is fabulous and I think will be a huge benefit to romance readers. Keep up the great work!
		+
		+	Diana
		+	--[[User:Dlau\|Dlau]] 07:05, 11 April 2008 (PDT)
		+