Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kay T"
(Historical Romance Titles) |
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
If you have time, I'd like your opinion on the discussion at [http://www.romancewiki.com/Talk:Historical_Romance_Titles Talk:Historical_Romance_Titles]. <br>I've also left a message at Romancewiki's talk page to get their input too. [[User:Roaming27|Roaming27]] 00:37, 13 January 2007 (PST) | If you have time, I'd like your opinion on the discussion at [http://www.romancewiki.com/Talk:Historical_Romance_Titles Talk:Historical_Romance_Titles]. <br>I've also left a message at Romancewiki's talk page to get their input too. [[User:Roaming27|Roaming27]] 00:37, 13 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Categories == | ||
| + | I've been a little nuts this week and didn't get back to you about the category thing. I *did* start playing with them a little more, trying to refine them, that sort of thing. Even as I cut back and combined things, I saw where expansion will help (Regency, of course, being one that needs a lot of work). I'm trying to work off the structure you created as well. Today, I'm going to focus on original content instead of categories. Even my orderly (ha!) brain needs a play day! --[[User:Romancewiki|Romancewiki]] 11:08, 27 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 19:08, 27 January 2007
Hello
Hi Kay T, thank you for the welcome :-) Roaming27 13:53, 11 January 2007 (PST)
Drop Dead Gorgeous
I was wondering if something was missing from this sentence in Drop Dead Gorgeous, it doesn't read well:
Which challenge she accepts, but her resolve is tested when someone begins to try to kill her.
I posted here because I wasn't sure if it was on your watchlist. Thank you. Roaming27 14:27, 11 January 2007 (PST)
- thanks roam - I made a change, but feel free to edit me!!--Kay T 17:04, 12 January 2007 (PST)
- okee-dokee :-) Roaming27 22:16, 12 January 2007 (PST)
Historical Romance Titles
If you have time, I'd like your opinion on the discussion at Talk:Historical_Romance_Titles.
I've also left a message at Romancewiki's talk page to get their input too. Roaming27 00:37, 13 January 2007 (PST)
Categories
I've been a little nuts this week and didn't get back to you about the category thing. I *did* start playing with them a little more, trying to refine them, that sort of thing. Even as I cut back and combined things, I saw where expansion will help (Regency, of course, being one that needs a lot of work). I'm trying to work off the structure you created as well. Today, I'm going to focus on original content instead of categories. Even my orderly (ha!) brain needs a play day! --Romancewiki 11:08, 27 January 2007 (PST)
