Difference between revisions of "Talk:Harlequin"

From Romance Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: ==Romance Line== Why is Romance showing as a defunct imprint? I see that there are books listed until July, but is that imprint being discontinued at that time? If so, maybe we need to men...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Romance Line==
 
==Romance Line==
 
Why is Romance showing as a defunct imprint? I see that there are books listed until July, but is that imprint being discontinued at that time? If so, maybe we need to mention that on the [[Harlequin Romance]] page. --[[User:Kay T|Kay T]] 12:25, 17 May 2007 (PDT)
 
Why is Romance showing as a defunct imprint? I see that there are books listed until July, but is that imprint being discontinued at that time? If so, maybe we need to mention that on the [[Harlequin Romance]] page. --[[User:Kay T|Kay T]] 12:25, 17 May 2007 (PDT)
 +
 +
As far as I'm aware, after January 2007 or so the Silhouette Romance line merged with the Harlequin Romance line, so now the Silhouette Romance line is defunct (at least, on the Harlequin website I looked up [http://www.eharlequin.com/store.html?cid=232 Silhouette Romance] and the only books listed there were from January 2007). But Harlequin Romance isn't defunct, which would explain why you're seeing books listed in that line.--[[User:Laura V|Laura V]] 15:48, 17 May 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 22:48, 17 May 2007

Romance Line

Why is Romance showing as a defunct imprint? I see that there are books listed until July, but is that imprint being discontinued at that time? If so, maybe we need to mention that on the Harlequin Romance page. --Kay T 12:25, 17 May 2007 (PDT)

As far as I'm aware, after January 2007 or so the Silhouette Romance line merged with the Harlequin Romance line, so now the Silhouette Romance line is defunct (at least, on the Harlequin website I looked up Silhouette Romance and the only books listed there were from January 2007). But Harlequin Romance isn't defunct, which would explain why you're seeing books listed in that line.--Laura V 15:48, 17 May 2007 (PDT)