Difference between revisions of "User talk:Laura V"
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Romancewiki|Romancewiki]] 14:03, 24 June 2006 (PDT) | --[[User:Romancewiki|Romancewiki]] 14:03, 24 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah, OK, I'll try to remember that. Would you like me to put in more Mills & Boon entries, then? Also, when you're making entries for individual books, is what you write supposed to be like a short review? Or would you prefer it if I just copied out back-cover copy (or does that break copyright?)? How gushing is one allowed to get over one's favourite books? I was trying to keep it relatively low-key. And does one try to avoid spoilers? Apologies if you've explained all this somewhere and I've missed it. | ||
Revision as of 22:50, 24 June 2006
Hi Laura -- I'm so glad that you're adding the Mills & Boon stuff. It's a particular area of weakness for me. I am making one small change to your pages, due to the fact that the "&" is a trigger for programming:
[[Mills and Boon|Mills & Boon]]
I learned this when I tried to add Pride & Prejudice -- and kept making myself crazy because I knew I'd done it. There are a few punctuation marks that programmers decided weren't really important and made them triggers for actions (like the @ mark).
--Romancewiki 14:03, 24 June 2006 (PDT)
Ah, OK, I'll try to remember that. Would you like me to put in more Mills & Boon entries, then? Also, when you're making entries for individual books, is what you write supposed to be like a short review? Or would you prefer it if I just copied out back-cover copy (or does that break copyright?)? How gushing is one allowed to get over one's favourite books? I was trying to keep it relatively low-key. And does one try to avoid spoilers? Apologies if you've explained all this somewhere and I've missed it.
