Difference between revisions of "Guilty As Sin - Cathy Gillen Thacker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[Category:1994 Releases]][[Category:Romantic Suspense]][[Category:Category Romance]] | + | [[Category:1994 Releases]] |
+ | [[Category:Romantic Suspense]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Category Romance]] | ||
+ | [[category:Lawyer]] | ||
+ | [[category:Texas]] | ||
+ | |||
* '''Author''': [[Cathy Gillen Thacker]] | * '''Author''': [[Cathy Gillen Thacker]] | ||
− | * '''Publisher''': [[ | + | * '''Publisher''': [[Harlequin Intrigue]] [[Harlequin Intrigue By The Numbers|# 300]] |
− | * '''Year''': | + | * '''Year''': 1994 |
− | * '''Setting''': | + | * '''Setting''': Austin, Texas |
− | * '''Amazon Listing''' | + | * '''Amazon Listing''': [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0373223005/ref=nosim/103-3685024-2000659?n=283155 Guilty As Sin] |
− | [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0373223005/ref=nosim/103-3685024-2000659?n=283155 Guilty As Sin] | + | |
+ | == Book Description == | ||
+ | It was the hottest case in Austin, and Susan Kilpatrick was the hotshot lawyer who was hand-picked to defend charismatic attorney general Jake Lockhart. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The sensational trial would skyrocket Susan to the top…if she won a not-guilty verdict. But was her client an innocent man? All the evidence said that he was a lady-killer who’d committed a crime of passion. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Curiously, Jake refused to discuss his defense--instead, he tried to seduce his attorney. Would Susan succumb to his charms and chance becoming his next female victim? |
Latest revision as of 23:14, 20 November 2022
- Author: Cathy Gillen Thacker
- Publisher: Harlequin Intrigue # 300
- Year: 1994
- Setting: Austin, Texas
- Amazon Listing: Guilty As Sin
Book Description
It was the hottest case in Austin, and Susan Kilpatrick was the hotshot lawyer who was hand-picked to defend charismatic attorney general Jake Lockhart.
The sensational trial would skyrocket Susan to the top…if she won a not-guilty verdict. But was her client an innocent man? All the evidence said that he was a lady-killer who’d committed a crime of passion.
Curiously, Jake refused to discuss his defense--instead, he tried to seduce his attorney. Would Susan succumb to his charms and chance becoming his next female victim?