Difference between revisions of "User talk:Amy"
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) m (Disambig Pages) |
(Jamie Sobrato note) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Amy -- I'm working on adding new content and just ran into a situation where you have a disambig page to create on your list that is also part of my workflow. I'm noting that I've created the page on ''your'' user page so you know that at least that portion of the work has been done. If you'd rather I notified you in another way, just say the word!--[[User:Romancewiki|Romancewiki]] 10:31, 22 December 2007 (PST) | Amy -- I'm working on adding new content and just ran into a situation where you have a disambig page to create on your list that is also part of my workflow. I'm noting that I've created the page on ''your'' user page so you know that at least that portion of the work has been done. If you'd rather I notified you in another way, just say the word!--[[User:Romancewiki|Romancewiki]] 10:31, 22 December 2007 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Thanks Kassia. As long as it's not too much work for you noting it on my page, that works for me. If it gets annoying, though, feel free to stop -- I'll eventually see if a page has already been done if I click the link on my user page and delete it from my list. Happy holidays! --[[User:Amy|Amy]] 16:04, 23 December 2007 (PST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Quick Note == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I stopped by briefly the other day (I've missed it here!) and I wanted to let you know I did some work on [[Jamie Sobrato]]'s page and I see you have it noted here for work. Don't know if I covered what you were going to do but I thought I'd let you know that ''something'' has been done. Dunno if I'll be back much, but I had a great time on the morning I spent here. --[[User:DawnBurn|DawnBurn]] 18:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:32, 5 March 2009
Contents
Welcome
Welcome, Amy! I wanted to thank you for all your hard work (and, yes, excellent use of categories! I am a category junkie). The HH titles are a particular black hole for me (don't know why, but I never really read many of them), so I think it's terrific that you're covering them (did you notice that Margaret Moore stopped by and did some work on her page as well?). If you have any questions or need anything, please don't hesitate to ask!--Romancewiki 09:41, 26 August 2007 (PDT)
- Just wanted to second the welcome. You don't know how warm and tingly I get from seeing someone cleaning up typos, links, categories, etc.! I created some new categories to group the Harlequin lines and imprints together (thanks for creating the Kimani page). See category:Harlequin, what do you think? --Kay T 17:31, 29 August 2007 (PDT)
Hello & LUNA Work
Hello Amy! I posted a note on the Talk:Luna page since you were so kind as to correct several of the series names I'd used and I had a question for you. --DawnBurn 18:38, 29 August 2007 (PDT)
Covers & Images
Amy, I saw you played a little with moving links to covers around. I wanted to let you know I followed those links and uploaded the cover to here. You can do the same thing by saving the picture to your hard drive, and then uploading it via the Upload File link on the left of the RomanceWiki. Then you can link to it by following Image Editing Instructions from Wikipedia (basically use [[Image:Imagename.jpg]] to include them. For the two I edited I also included [[Image:Imagename.jpg|right]] to make them align to the right of the page. --DawnBurn 14:27, 5 September 2007 (PDT)
Harlequin Historicals
Hi Amy -- I apologize for the delay in getting back to you. Long week. Yes, it's much easier to break the pages down into chunks of 100 (very long pages are tough to read!). Another option is to break it down by years (as I did with the Harlequin Romances. I chose this latter option for this series because it allowed me to highlight different trends with the imprint over time.--Romancewiki 09:56, 8 September 2007 (PDT)
Same Title - Anthologies
I responded over on my talk page, but wanted to let you know that the solution you came up with "Title - Anthology" is just great! I never ever considered anthologies with the same title (obviously haven't encountered that scenario yet in my own work!), so am pleased you've solved a new and magical problem. I'm on vacation this week, so will be especially slow in responding. No wikis on the beach (though my RW t-shirt has been spending more than a little time snorkeling!).--Romancewiki 22:06, 22 October 2007 (PDT)
- Amy, thanks for taking care of this. You might want to make it clear on the help pages that [[Title - Anthology]] is for use when there is an anthology and a book with the same title. If there are two anthologies with the same title, do we want to use the publisher? --Kay T 11:38, 23 October 2007 (PDT)
- Hi Kay T. There's a small Author - Same Name section in the Style Manual, so I was going to put the small note about anthologies under that as well as on the more detailed page. If there's two anthologies, I agree that using the publisher is the best solution. --Amy 13:49, 23 October 2007 (PDT)
- Sounds good. I will check it out when you have made the changes (looks like you are done, but I am at work, heh, heh). --Kay T 17:07, 23 October 2007 (PDT)
Year Link Removal
Amy, just wanted to say thanks for all your work on this and I laughed when I went to grab some and they were already fixed by you! --DawnBurn 15:48, 13 November 2007 (PST)
- No problem, guess we were working on it at the same time, haha. I think that's all of them now... (here's hoping!) --Amy 15:51, 13 November 2007 (PST)
Temptation
Amy -- Just letting you know that I expect all the work on the Temptation problem to be done tomorrow or soon thereafter. All links will be changed to Harlequin Temptation. Since I was in the process of creating author pages for the HT authors (which I didn't do when I did the by-the-numbers page -- weird), I went back and changed all those entries as well.--Romancewiki 20:58, 6 December 2007 (PST)
Wow! Award
Amy -- you've been super-wikiing later. I'm just stunned at how much work you're doing! I hereby bestow the Wow! Award upon you.--Romancewiki 10:12, 15 December 2007 (PST)
- Heehee, thanks! I'm on winter break right now so I can fix everything I've noticed but didn't have time change to before. Happy Holidays!--Amy 11:29, 15 December 2007 (PST)
Disambig Pages
Amy -- I'm working on adding new content and just ran into a situation where you have a disambig page to create on your list that is also part of my workflow. I'm noting that I've created the page on your user page so you know that at least that portion of the work has been done. If you'd rather I notified you in another way, just say the word!--Romancewiki 10:31, 22 December 2007 (PST)
- Thanks Kassia. As long as it's not too much work for you noting it on my page, that works for me. If it gets annoying, though, feel free to stop -- I'll eventually see if a page has already been done if I click the link on my user page and delete it from my list. Happy holidays! --Amy 16:04, 23 December 2007 (PST)
Quick Note
I stopped by briefly the other day (I've missed it here!) and I wanted to let you know I did some work on Jamie Sobrato's page and I see you have it noted here for work. Don't know if I covered what you were going to do but I thought I'd let you know that something has been done. Dunno if I'll be back much, but I had a great time on the morning I spent here. --DawnBurn 18:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)