Difference between revisions of "RITA®: Best Contemporary Series Romance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) m (New page: Category:Romance Industry Awards For the 2008 RITA awards, the Romance Writers of America changed their award structure. While in the past, category (or series) romance had bee...) |
(+2010 and 2009 Winners) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Historically-related categories to "Contemporary Series Romance" were: [[RITA®: Best Long Contemporary Series]], [[RITA®: Best Short Contemporary Series]], and [[RITA®: Best Traditional Romance]]. | Historically-related categories to "Contemporary Series Romance" were: [[RITA®: Best Long Contemporary Series]], [[RITA®: Best Short Contemporary Series]], and [[RITA®: Best Traditional Romance]]. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Winners == | ||
+ | * [[Beth Andrews]] - [[2010 RITA® Winners|2010]] - ''[[A Not-So-Perfect Past]]'', [[Harlequin|Harlequin Enterprises]], [[Harlequin Superromance]] | ||
+ | * [[Karen Templeton]] - [[2009 RITA® Winners|2009]] - ''[[A Mother's Wish - Karen Templeton|A Mother's Wish]]'', [[Harlequin|Harlequin Enterprises]], [[Silhouette Special Edition]] | ||
+ | * [[Janice Kay Johnson]] - [[2008 RITA® Winners|2008]] - ''[[Snowbound - Janice Kay Johnson|Snowbound]]'', [[Harlequin|Harlequin Enterprises]], [[Harlequin Superromance]] |
Latest revision as of 07:37, 4 August 2010
For the 2008 RITA awards, the Romance Writers of America changed their award structure. While in the past, category (or series) romance had been divided into sub-categories -- initially "sweet" and "sensual", later by length with "traditional" romance broken out, the 2008 awards recognized the fact that this differentiation was not required, primarily due to the fact that word counts for all lines were similar.
Historically-related categories to "Contemporary Series Romance" were: RITA®: Best Long Contemporary Series, RITA®: Best Short Contemporary Series, and RITA®: Best Traditional Romance.