Difference between revisions of "Vampire"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | In romance, the vampire has enduring appeal. You have your ultimate bad boy, you have your blood metaphor, and you have the appeal of eternal love. Then there's the downside: the killing, the fear, and never getting a tan. | + | [[Category: Vampire|*]][[category:Paranormal Plot Devices]] |
+ | In romance, the '''vampire''' has enduring appeal. You have your ultimate bad boy, you have your blood metaphor, and you have the appeal of eternal love. Then there's the downside: the killing, the fear, and never getting a tan. Vampires are considered a sub-genre of the [[paranormal]] [[Romance Sub-Genres|sub-genre]]. | ||
== External Articles == | == External Articles == | ||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
* [http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2006-06-28-vampire-romance_x.htm Romance fans: Vampires are just our type] - ''USA Today'' covers the release of [[Laurell K. Hamilton|Laurell K. Hamilton's]] latest and also takes a look at [[Sherrilyn Kenyon]], [[MaryJanice Davidson]], and [[Christine Feehan]]. | * [http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2006-06-28-vampire-romance_x.htm Romance fans: Vampires are just our type] - ''USA Today'' covers the release of [[Laurell K. Hamilton|Laurell K. Hamilton's]] latest and also takes a look at [[Sherrilyn Kenyon]], [[MaryJanice Davidson]], and [[Christine Feehan]]. | ||
* [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1161234,00.html Well, Hello, Suckers The newest romantic hero is dark, brooding and tortured. And liked by all types: A, B and O+] - ''Time'' magazine looks at the vampire phenomenon. | * [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1161234,00.html Well, Hello, Suckers The newest romantic hero is dark, brooding and tortured. And liked by all types: A, B and O+] - ''Time'' magazine looks at the vampire phenomenon. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Authors == | ||
+ | * [[Annie Alvarez|Alvarez, Annie]] | ||
+ | * [[Charlotte Boyett~Compo|Boyett~Compo, Charlotte]] | ||
+ | * [[J.K. Coi| Coi, J.K.]] | ||
+ | * [[H.A. Fowler|Fowler, H.A.]] | ||
+ | * [[Sheri Gilmore|Gilmore, Sheri]] | ||
+ | * [[Nathalie Gray|Gray, Nathalie]] | ||
+ | * [[F E Heaton|Heaton, F E]] | ||
+ | * [[Felicity Heaton|Heaton, Felicity ]] | ||
+ | * [[Gracen Miller|Miller, Gracen]] | ||
+ | * [[Luxie Ryder| Ryder, Luxie]] |
Latest revision as of 08:36, 17 May 2011
In romance, the vampire has enduring appeal. You have your ultimate bad boy, you have your blood metaphor, and you have the appeal of eternal love. Then there's the downside: the killing, the fear, and never getting a tan. Vampires are considered a sub-genre of the paranormal sub-genre.
External Articles
How the Vampire romance is covered in the media:
- Romance fans: Vampires are just our type - USA Today covers the release of Laurell K. Hamilton's latest and also takes a look at Sherrilyn Kenyon, MaryJanice Davidson, and Christine Feehan.
- Well, Hello, Suckers The newest romantic hero is dark, brooding and tortured. And liked by all types: A, B and O+ - Time magazine looks at the vampire phenomenon.