Difference between revisions of "Diamond Of Deceit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:1990 Releases]] [[Category:Category Romance]][[Category:Romantic Suspense]] | [[Category:1990 Releases]] [[Category:Category Romance]][[Category:Romantic Suspense]] | ||
* '''Author''': [[M.L. Gamble]] | * '''Author''': [[M.L. Gamble]] | ||
| − | * '''Publisher''': [[Intrigue]] | + | * '''Publisher''': [[Intrigue|Harlequin Intrigue]] [[Harlequin Intrigue By The Numbers|#146]] |
* '''Year''': 1990 | * '''Year''': 1990 | ||
| − | * '''Setting''': | + | * '''Setting''': California |
| − | * '''Amazon Listing''' | + | * '''Amazon Listing''': [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0373221460/ref=nosim/103-3685024-2000659?n=283155 Diamond Of Deceit] |
| + | |||
| + | == Book Description == | ||
| + | Bank executive Emma Kingston was on vacation when the vault blew up. A man was killed--and his identity strangely obliterated. A king's ransom littered the floor--but not a thing was stolen. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Philip Rowlands proposed a chilling explanation for the bizarre break-in. After years of hunting down Coop, Emma's fiancé, Philip claimed to have tracked him to the scene of the crime. Apparently Emma had something that had belonged to Coop--and now he wanted it back. But Coop had given Emma nothing--except memories that had turned bitter two years ago, when he was presumed dead. Was Philip the answer to an imperiled woman's prayer? Or the deluded prisoner of an obsession? | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 29 September 2007
- Author: M.L. Gamble
- Publisher: Harlequin Intrigue #146
- Year: 1990
- Setting: California
- Amazon Listing: Diamond Of Deceit
Book Description
Bank executive Emma Kingston was on vacation when the vault blew up. A man was killed--and his identity strangely obliterated. A king's ransom littered the floor--but not a thing was stolen.
Philip Rowlands proposed a chilling explanation for the bizarre break-in. After years of hunting down Coop, Emma's fiancé, Philip claimed to have tracked him to the scene of the crime. Apparently Emma had something that had belonged to Coop--and now he wanted it back. But Coop had given Emma nothing--except memories that had turned bitter two years ago, when he was presumed dead. Was Philip the answer to an imperiled woman's prayer? Or the deluded prisoner of an obsession?
