Difference between revisions of "Talk:Prolific Romance Authors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) m (New page: I'm collecting more names for this list as well. I'll do an update in a few months or so. It's easier to add a mass of names for me from a spreadsheet I'm keeping on this stuff.--~~~~) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm collecting more names for this list as well. I'll do an update in a few months or so. It's easier to add a mass of names for me from a spreadsheet I'm keeping on this stuff.--[[User:Romancewiki|Romancewiki]] 10:09, 29 April 2007 (PDT) | I'm collecting more names for this list as well. I'll do an update in a few months or so. It's easier to add a mass of names for me from a spreadsheet I'm keeping on this stuff.--[[User:Romancewiki|Romancewiki]] 10:09, 29 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :As you can see I did add some names on this. The Barbara Cartland # is from her website. The Nora number was a count I did that included some anthologies, so probably too high (but she must be getting close to 200). Looking at the category:prolific authors, there are lots listed there so a cross check with this list and that category would probably yield some names if not numbers. Next time I get some extra time I will start looking them up.--[[User:Kay T|Kay T]] 19:55, 29 April 2007 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 02:55, 30 April 2007
I'm collecting more names for this list as well. I'll do an update in a few months or so. It's easier to add a mass of names for me from a spreadsheet I'm keeping on this stuff.--Romancewiki 10:09, 29 April 2007 (PDT)
- As you can see I did add some names on this. The Barbara Cartland # is from her website. The Nora number was a count I did that included some anthologies, so probably too high (but she must be getting close to 200). Looking at the category:prolific authors, there are lots listed there so a cross check with this list and that category would probably yield some names if not numbers. Next time I get some extra time I will start looking them up.--Kay T 19:55, 29 April 2007 (PDT)