Difference between revisions of "RITA®: Best Historical Romance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Streetmouse (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:RITA Winners]] |
The Historical Romance category was established for the 2008 [[RITA]] awards. Previously, historical romance had been divided by length, with one award given for [[RITA®: Best Short Historical Romance]] and another for [[RITA®: Best Long Historical Romance]]. A third historical category, [[RITA®: Best Regency Romance]], also existed. The Regency category focused on shorter novels that were largely devoid of sensual details the longer historical novels contained. Publishers abandoned the stand-alone Regency titles and the category was renamed [[RITA®: Regency Historical Romance]] in 2008. | The Historical Romance category was established for the 2008 [[RITA]] awards. Previously, historical romance had been divided by length, with one award given for [[RITA®: Best Short Historical Romance]] and another for [[RITA®: Best Long Historical Romance]]. A third historical category, [[RITA®: Best Regency Romance]], also existed. The Regency category focused on shorter novels that were largely devoid of sensual details the longer historical novels contained. Publishers abandoned the stand-alone Regency titles and the category was renamed [[RITA®: Regency Historical Romance]] in 2008. | ||
== Winners == | == Winners == | ||
* [[Madeline Hunter]] - [[2008 RITA® Winners|2008]] - ''[[Lessons Of Desire]]'', [[Bantam Dell Publishing Group]] | * [[Madeline Hunter]] - [[2008 RITA® Winners|2008]] - ''[[Lessons Of Desire]]'', [[Bantam Dell Publishing Group]] |
Revision as of 16:08, 14 January 2009
The Historical Romance category was established for the 2008 RITA awards. Previously, historical romance had been divided by length, with one award given for RITA®: Best Short Historical Romance and another for RITA®: Best Long Historical Romance. A third historical category, RITA®: Best Regency Romance, also existed. The Regency category focused on shorter novels that were largely devoid of sensual details the longer historical novels contained. Publishers abandoned the stand-alone Regency titles and the category was renamed RITA®: Regency Historical Romance in 2008.