Difference between revisions of "Vampire"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category: Vampire|*]] | + | [[Category: Vampire|*]][[category:Paranormal Plot Devices]] |
In romance, the '''vampire''' has enduring appeal. You have your ultimate bad boy, you have your blood metaphor, and you have the appeal of eternal love. Then there's the downside: the killing, the fear, and never getting a tan. Vampires are considered a sub-genre of the [[paranormal]] [[Romance Sub-Genres|sub-genre]]. | In romance, the '''vampire''' has enduring appeal. You have your ultimate bad boy, you have your blood metaphor, and you have the appeal of eternal love. Then there's the downside: the killing, the fear, and never getting a tan. Vampires are considered a sub-genre of the [[paranormal]] [[Romance Sub-Genres|sub-genre]]. | ||
Revision as of 03:54, 30 January 2009
In romance, the vampire has enduring appeal. You have your ultimate bad boy, you have your blood metaphor, and you have the appeal of eternal love. Then there's the downside: the killing, the fear, and never getting a tan. Vampires are considered a sub-genre of the paranormal sub-genre.
External Articles
How the Vampire romance is covered in the media:
- Romance fans: Vampires are just our type - USA Today covers the release of Laurell K. Hamilton's latest and also takes a look at Sherrilyn Kenyon, MaryJanice Davidson, and Christine Feehan.
- Well, Hello, Suckers The newest romantic hero is dark, brooding and tortured. And liked by all types: A, B and O+ - Time magazine looks at the vampire phenomenon.
