Difference between revisions of "Vampire"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) m |
Romancewiki (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== External Articles == | == External Articles == | ||
How the [[Vampire]] romance is covered in the media: | How the [[Vampire]] romance is covered in the media: | ||
| − | * [http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2006-06-28-vampire-romance_x.htm Romance fans: Vampires are just our type] | + | * [http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2006-06-28-vampire-romance_x.htm Romance fans: Vampires are just our type] - ''USA Today'' covers the release of [[Laurell K. Hamilton|Laurell K. Hamilton's]] latest and also takes a look at [[Sherilyn Kenyon]], [[MaryJanice Davidson]], and [[Christine Feehan]]. |
* [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1161234,00.html Well, Hello, Suckers The newest romantic hero is dark, brooding and tortured. And liked by all types: A, B and O+] - ''Time'' magazine looks at the vampire phenomenon. | * [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1161234,00.html Well, Hello, Suckers The newest romantic hero is dark, brooding and tortured. And liked by all types: A, B and O+] - ''Time'' magazine looks at the vampire phenomenon. | ||
Revision as of 21:06, 2 July 2006
In romance, the vampire has enduring appeal. You have your ultimate bad boy, you have your blood metaphor, and you have the appeal of eternal love. Then there's the downside: the killing, the fear, and never getting a tan.
External Articles
How the Vampire romance is covered in the media:
- Romance fans: Vampires are just our type - USA Today covers the release of Laurell K. Hamilton's latest and also takes a look at Sherilyn Kenyon, MaryJanice Davidson, and Christine Feehan.
- Well, Hello, Suckers The newest romantic hero is dark, brooding and tortured. And liked by all types: A, B and O+ - Time magazine looks at the vampire phenomenon.
