Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Moving, Deleting, Merging Pages"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→All Caps Titles: typo) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==All Caps Titles== | ==All Caps Titles== | ||
I see that [[User:Robini|Robini]] found a few pages that were all caps versions of titles that had correct pages already made. In my opinion, rather than offering a redirect (as [[User:Kay T | Kay T]] did) deleting the articles outright. If there are no pages referring to them (and there shouldn't be) it become an "orphaned" page and leaving the redirect allows people to think that style is acceptable rather than trying to find the correctly formatted page. --[[User:DawnBurn|DawnBurn]] 16:17, 14 September 2007 (PDT) | I see that [[User:Robini|Robini]] found a few pages that were all caps versions of titles that had correct pages already made. In my opinion, rather than offering a redirect (as [[User:Kay T | Kay T]] did) deleting the articles outright. If there are no pages referring to them (and there shouldn't be) it become an "orphaned" page and leaving the redirect allows people to think that style is acceptable rather than trying to find the correctly formatted page. --[[User:DawnBurn|DawnBurn]] 16:17, 14 September 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | :I did misspeak - it does appear that redirects *don't* stay on the "ophaned pages" page - unless you break the redirect by also categorizing, as I did. But I still agree with [[User:DawnBurn|DawnBurn]]. I can probably live with a to/To type typo (heck, I've created enough of them myself), but at least in terms of the all-caps, I think that if we find a page that *doesn't* comply with the style manual - and we bother to clean up the whatlinkshere so as to orphan it - we might as well delete it. Othewise, it'll encourage people who are a little overattached to their caps button link to it again. And I *really* don't like to see those screaming at me. --[[User:Robini|Robini]] 16:41, 14 September 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 23:41, 14 September 2007
All Caps Titles
I see that Robini found a few pages that were all caps versions of titles that had correct pages already made. In my opinion, rather than offering a redirect (as Kay T did) deleting the articles outright. If there are no pages referring to them (and there shouldn't be) it become an "orphaned" page and leaving the redirect allows people to think that style is acceptable rather than trying to find the correctly formatted page. --DawnBurn 16:17, 14 September 2007 (PDT)
- I did misspeak - it does appear that redirects *don't* stay on the "ophaned pages" page - unless you break the redirect by also categorizing, as I did. But I still agree with DawnBurn. I can probably live with a to/To type typo (heck, I've created enough of them myself), but at least in terms of the all-caps, I think that if we find a page that *doesn't* comply with the style manual - and we bother to clean up the whatlinkshere so as to orphan it - we might as well delete it. Othewise, it'll encourage people who are a little overattached to their caps button link to it again. And I *really* don't like to see those screaming at me. --Robini 16:41, 14 September 2007 (PDT)
